🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," said one MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," stated a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some individuals to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this international conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that states globally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.