🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency caused by the announcement of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Diplomacy and Destruction

The chain of opposing developments captured the grim essence of the outgoing year. By day, negotiation efforts are conducted: positive announcements are issued from various governments. Significant resources is expended on managing certain initiatives. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's exposure was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor projectile deployments from across the border, a capacity provided through current data. From observation points, military aircraft that had been scrambled to engage hostile guided weapons roared overhead – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by European allies.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely delivered by partner states. Every deployment jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The instant of fear quickly transforms into resigned acknowledgment: possibly the incoming missile won't cause damage this time, preventing destruction from ruin and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Soon after, a automatic firearm opened up on a unmanned aircraft close by, part of a rapid response unit – probably imported technology. Regrettably, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the morning news: multiple fatalities, devastation and infrastructure problems in many homes as a result of the nocturnal offensive. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those 24 hours encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a reliance that European nations are evidently unprepared to replace in the short term.

Failed Diplomacy

The comprehensive proposal from American leadership sparked intense emotion, controversy and serious worry – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after prior negotiation attempts and international summits.

Every new proposal from US leadership unfolds according to the consistent cycle: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually secure success. This pattern will, certainly, endure.

Strategic Calculations

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of persistently promoting Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. US administration functions according to a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have been unable to protect through force. The American government assumes that it is impossible to force Russia to relinquish the land that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, US leadership does little to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from believing that the current condition will not change more in its favour in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are approaching exhaustion. Their motivation to accept conditions that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains completely certain in the result.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still persist, gradually sacrificing lives and land but averting a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its advantage.

Current Realities

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a ceasefire. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: political desires to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's twin challenges – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the national cause against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their attention does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will change their overall approach.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to eliminate the proposed articles of the latest plan. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by American leadership, opposition by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of negotiators, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new proposals based on established approaches are approaching, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist political attacks from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect certain reluctance to modify developments, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a much faster pace. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the predictable period, mainly require ongoing international assistance.